<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NavSite &#187; europe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://navsite.com/tag/europe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://navsite.com</link>
	<description>Transports and Logistics Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:22:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Provisional UK port statistics for 2005</title>
		<link>http://navsite.com/2006/05/30/provisional-uk-port-statistics-for-2005/</link>
		<comments>http://navsite.com/2006/05/30/provisional-uk-port-statistics-for-2005/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 23:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>T&#38;LPro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[By Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freight traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liverpool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[london]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[port statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://navsite.com/2006/05/30/provisional-uk-port-statistics-for-2005/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2006/05/port_of_felixstowe_vessels.jpg" border="0" alt="Port of Felixstowe Vessels" hspace="10" width="190" height="158" align="right" /><strong>The United Kingdom&#8217;s <a href="http://www.dft.gov.uk/" target="_blank">Department for Transport</a> has today published <a href="http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_transstats/documents/page/dft_transstats_611701.hcsp" target="_blank">National Statistics on freight traffic handled at UK ports in 2005</a>.</strong></p>
<p>These provisional port statistics for 2005 show that:</p>
<ul>
<li>Total freight traffic rose by 8.5 million tonnes (Mt) to 581.6 Mt in 2005, 1.5 per cent up on 2004;</li>
<li>Inwards traffic rose by 9.7 Mt to 352.1 Mt, whilst outwards traffic fell by 1.2 Mt to 229.4 Mt;</li>
<li>Freight traffic through the 52 major UK ports totalled 565.8 Mt, up 7.6 Mt on 2004. This represented 97 per cent of total UK port freight traffic in 2005;</li>
<li>Grimsby and Immingham maintained its position as the UK&#8217;s leading port in 2005 with 58.1 Mt (0.4 Mt up on 2004), followed by Tees and Hartlepool with 55.8 Mt (up 2.0 Mt) and London with 53.8 Mt (up 0.6 Mt);</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>The top ten ports in 2005, in terms of tonnage, were as follows:</strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="10" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#efefef"><a href="http://www.ports-uk.com/" target="_blank">Grimsby and Immingham</a></td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#efefef">58.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#efefef"><a href="http://www.thpal.co.uk/" target="_blank">Tees and Hartlepool</a></td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#efefef">55.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#efefef"><a href="http://www.portoflondon.co.uk/" target="_blank">London</a></td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#efefef">53.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#efefef"><a href="http://www.southamptonspin.co.uk/" target="_blank">Southampton</a></td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#efefef">39.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#efefef"><a href="http://www.mhpa.co.uk/" target="_blank">Milford Haven</a></td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#efefef">37.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#efefef"><a href="http://www.forthports.co.uk/" target="_blank">Forth</a></td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#efefef">34.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#efefef"><a href="http://www.merseydocks.co.uk/" target="_blank">Liverpool</a></td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#efefef">33.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#efefef"><a href="http://www.portoffelixstowe.co.uk/" target="_blank">Felixstowe</a></td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#efefef">23.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#efefef"><a href="http://www.doverport.co.uk/" target="_blank">Dover</a></td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#efefef">21.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#efefef"><a href="http://www.shetland.gov.uk/ports/" target="_blank">Sullom Voe</a></td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#efefef">20.5</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table border="0" cellspacing="10" cellpadding="1" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><em>Although these statistics for 2005 are still provisional, they clearly show UK&#8217;s major sea ports are in good health and growing, especially when it comes to the millions of tons of freight they handle.</em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-size: xx-small;">Tags: uk, ports, port statistics, europe, navigation, shipping, london, liverpool, freight traffic</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://navsite.com/2006/05/30/provisional-uk-port-statistics-for-2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taking the Swedish FlyWay</title>
		<link>http://navsite.com/2006/02/15/taking-the-swedish-flyway/</link>
		<comments>http://navsite.com/2006/02/15/taking-the-swedish-flyway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>T&#38;LPro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[By Rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suspended rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swedetrack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swedish flyway]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://navsite.com/2006/02/15/taking-the-swedish-flyway/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Naturally similar to the monorail, the innovative FlyWay urban transit system can move people and cargo along fixed beamed aerial pathways.</strong>

While Siemens had perfected previous concepts, a Swedish company has taken interest in the idea and pushed the engineering of this alternative transport method to the next level.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.swedetrack.com/" target="_blank">SwedeTrack System</a> is a public Swedish company which has designed the FlyWay, a technically advanced system for automatically controlled beamcarried traffic, for transportation of people and goods.</strong></p>
<p>This suspended rail system allegedly has many practical uses for the masses that must commute in cities flooded with cars from the urban sprawl.</p>
<p>To better understand the use of a FlyWay, the SwedeTrack people have provided some background insight:</p>
<blockquote><p><em><br />
SwedeTrack has in detail studied how a good transportation system for people and for goods should function, and what attributes it should have, in order to be of optimal use in an urban environmenet.</em></p>
<p><em>The cheapest and quickest way to produce a functioning system is by further development of the &#8220;SIPEM&#8221; system developed by Siemens in Germany. We at SwedeTrack have chosen to call this complete system of ours for &#8220;FLYWAY&#8221;</em></p>
<p><em>Since Siemens has chosen to no longer promote its own system, SwedeTrack has developed this by itself. Thus, FLYWAY is a genuinely Swedish project.</em></p>
<p><em>The details that distinguish &#8220;FLYWAY&#8221;® from other existing and proposed systems are:</em></p>
<ul>
<li><em>the beamcars can be equipped with lifts</em></li>
<li><em>the beamcars can be equipped with swiveling functions</em></li>
<li><em>the system is designed for scheduled transports, individual transports and transportation of goods, intermixed</em></li>
<li><em>the system has computer-controlled functions that allow the size and complexity of the network to grow indefinitely</em></li>
<li><em>the system uses addressing functions based on that of the Internet</em></li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>Since February 2004, SwedeTrack System Inc. is a public company and <a href="http://www.swedetrack.com/stpsv.htm#3" target="_blank">offers shares (Swedish only)</a> to interested parties.</p>
<p>The inventors of this engaging urban transportation system have also caught our attention with this statement: &#8220;To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism; to steal from many is research.&#8221; — in our view, when two distinct ideas meet for the first time, they inevitably give way to a third idea which is, by its very nature, something new.</p>
<p>On a lighter note, the term &#8220;FlyWay&#8221; is presented as a registered trademark but <a href="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=toc&amp;state=a374ia.1.1&amp;p_search=searchss&amp;p_L=50&amp;BackReference=&amp;p_plural=no&amp;p_s_PARA1=live&amp;p_tagrepl%7E%3A=PARA1%24LD&amp;expr=PARA1+AND+PARA2&amp;p_s_PARA2=flyway&amp;p_tagrepl%7E%3A=PARA2%24COMB&amp;p_op_ALL=AND&amp;a_default=search&amp;a_search=Submit+Query&amp;a_search=Submit+Query" target="_blank">our search at the USPTO yielded no relevant results</a>. Perhaps it&#8217;s registered in Sweden.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: xx-small;">Tags: sweden, swedish flyway, swedetrack, suspended rail, mass transit, alternative transport, europe</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://navsite.com/2006/02/15/taking-the-swedish-flyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	<img style='margin:0;padding:0;border:0;' width='1px' height='1px' src="http://navsite.com/wp-content/plugins/mystat/mystat.php?act=time_load&id=11644&rnd=1217752567" /></channel>
</rss>
